Linking the Researchers, Developing the Innovations Manuscripts submittal opens till 10 May 2024. Please submit your papers at or

  • Volume 2019

    Analysis of Non-Standardized Traffic Calming Devices under Local Conditions of Pakistan
    (International Journal of Engineering Works)

    Vol. 6, Issue 01, PP. 12-26, January 2019
    Keywords: Traffic calming devices, Speed hump, Speed bump, Speed table, Steel stud

    Download PDF


    The paper presents the issues regarding traffic calming devices in Pakistan. The problem is that no comprehensive analysis of the impacts of the traffic calming devices had been done previously. The paper proposed answer to three questions: 1) What are the current practices of traffic calming devices in Pakistan 2) What guidelines and standard exist for installation of these devices? 3) What are the suitable measures for the execution of traffic calming devices? To achieve these goals field survey and questionnaire survey was conducted in order to evaluate the current condition of traffic calming devices and to know the perception of general public about device suitability, quality and their agreement. Different agencies were visited which look after it and interviewed different officials to inquire about the design and maintenance of calming devices. The major findings were: 1) Traffic calming devices are not constructed according to standard dimensions and there is lot of variations in implementation 2) Regulations regarding design, construction and installation of traffic calming devices are established at local level. 3) Suitable measures are suggested for the installation of traffic calming devices.



    1. Saira Ramzan: National Institute of Transportation, National University of Science & Technology, Islamabad
    2. Muhammad Jawed Iqbal: National Institute of Transportation, National University of Science & Technology, Islamabad

    Full Text


    Saira Ramzan and Muhammad Jawed Iqbal, "Analysis of Non-Standardized Traffic Calming Devices under Local Conditions of Pakistan" International Journal of Engineering Works, Vol. 6 Issue 01 PP. 12-26 January 2019.


    1. A. Garcia, A. T. Moreno, M. A. Romero, “Technological development and validation of speed kidney, a new traffic calming device,” Journal of the Transportation Research Board, December 2011.

    2. L. S. Putranto, and K. Kurniawan, “Effect of type of road humps on vehicular speeds on residential roads,” 2018.

    3. F. Rahman, T. B. Joewono, and S. Al Masum, “Application of traffic calming devices in developing countries: learning lesson from bangladesh. ,” vol. , p. 119, 2018.

    4. G. González-Sánchez, E. Maeso-González, M. I. Olmo-Sánchez, M. Gutiérrez-Bedmar, A. Mariscal, and A. García-Rodríguez, “Road traffic injuries, mobility and gender. Patterns of risk in Southern Europe,” , 2018.

    5. T. A. Abdel-Wahed, I. H. Hashim, “Effect of speed hump characteristics on pavement condition,” 2017.

    6. T. Patel, and V. Vasudevan, “Impact of speed humps of bicyclists. ,” vol. , pp. 138-146, 2016.

    7. L. Jateikiene, T. Andriejauskas, I. Lingyte, and V. Jasiuniene, “Impact assessment of speed calming measures on road safety,” , vol. , pp. 4228-4236, 2016.

    8. L. Song, G. Feng, X. Guoyan, D. Nenggen, “The best speed limit range for road hump,” April 2015.

    9. S. M. Ghaemi and M. A. Sahraei, “Determining the Impact of road humps on road capacity,” 2013.

    10. A. Kanjanavapastita, and A. Thitinaruemitb, “Estimation of a speed hump profile using quarter car model,” Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 88, pp. 265 – 273, 2013.

    11. J. Ben-Edigbe and N. Mashros, “Extent of highway capacity loss resulting from road humps,” IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, April 2012.

    12. C. Johansson, P. Rosander, and L. Leden, “Distance between speed humps and pedestrian crossings: Does it matter?,”  , pp. 1846-1851, 2011.

    13. J. J. Zamorano, B. A. Marre, F. Ilabaca, A. U. Bacciarini, “Speed hump spine fractures injury mechanism and case series,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, December 2010.

    14. F. Rahman, A. Kojima, and H. Kubota, “Investigation on north american traffic calming device selection practices,” , vol. , pp. 105-119, 2009.

    15. P.Y. Zhua, J.P. Hesslingb and D.S. Liua, “Optimal road hump for comfortable speed reduction,” vol. 7130, 2008.

    16. R. R. Jaeger, “Traffic calming-speed humps, effect on emergency response times,” 2008.

    17. S. Aslan, O. Karcioglu, Y. Katirci, H. Kandis, N. Ezirmik, and O. Bilir, “Speed bump–induced spinal column injury,” , vol.  , pp. 563-564, 2005.

    18. D. Smith, S. Hallmark, K. Knapp, and G. Thomas, “Temporary speed hump impact evaluation,” July 2002.

    19. T. Robertson, “, 2000.