Linking the Researchers, Developing the Innovations Manuscripts submittal opens till 25 September, 2019. Please submit your papers at editor@kwpublisher.com or editorkwpublisher@gmail.com

  • Volume 2019

    Impact of Locus of Control (LOC) and Organizational Commitment on Employee performance- Study of Service Sector, Pakistan
    (International Journal of Law and Peace Works)

    Vol. 6, Issue 05, PP. 01-06, May 2019
    DOI
    Keywords: Organizational Commitment, Locus of Control,Social learning, Planned Behavior

    Download PDF

    Abstract

    Area of this research focuses on the impact of internal and external locus of control (LOC) and organizational commitment on employee performance with focus on service industry of Pakistan i:e Careem (transportation network company) and to identify correlation; Pearson correlation was used which highlights the affirmative or favorable correlation between LOC and organizational commitment on employee performance who are employed in Careem Pakistan. To understand the influence of LOC and organizational commitment over employee performance inferential study was conducted in the form of survey. Closed ended questionnaire were filled by the respondents based on Likert scale and Instruction are written in the questionnaire for the respondent to read it and then fill the form with the ease. The respondents of the research belong to managerial position at top level, middle and lower level managers in Careem- a transportation service industry of Pakistan. Total 50 questionnaires were distributed among Careem employees from Hyderabad and 40 questionnaires were correctly attempted and returned that means response rate of survey was 80%. Finding of this research reveals that strength of correlation between Locus of control and employee performance in medium and doesn’t show enough evidence, whereas employee organizational commitment and employee performance shows strong correlation and reveal evidence of correlation. Employee who possess internal locus of control, belief that organizational commitment is necessary for employee performance whereas, employees who possess external locus of control belief that organizational commitment does not play major role in employee performance. Therefore, it is major responsibility of the manger to help their employees in understanding and shaping their locus of control because locus of control can be altered with proper training and effective communication.

    Author

    Amir Ali Khushk: Lecturer-Management Science, SZABIST University-Hyderabad

    Full Text

    Cite

    Amir Ali Khushk, "Impact of Locus of Control (LOC) and Organizational Commitment on Employee performance- Study of Service Sector, Pakistan" International Journal of Law and Peace Works" Vol. 6, Issue 05, PP. 01-06, May 2019.

    References

    [1]     Adebayo, D.O. (2006). The moderating effect of self-efficacy on job insecurity and organizational commitment among Nigerian public servants. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 6(1), 35-43.

    [2]     Alarape, A.I. and Akinlabi F.M. (2000). Influence of perceived organizational support and discretionary treatment on work attitude of industrial workers. African Journal for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 5(1), 23-36.

    [3]     Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. (10th, Ed.) London: Kogan Page Publishing.

    [4]     Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(1), 589-595.

    [5]     Chen ZX, Aryee S. (2007). Delegation and Employee Work Outcomes: An Examination of the Cultural Context of Mediating Processes in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 226-236.

    [6]     Chen, J. and Silverthorne, C. (2008). The Impact of Locus of Control on Job Stress, Job Performance and Job Satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(7), 572 - 582.

    [7]     Hamid, P. N. (1994). Self-monitoring, locus of control, and social encounters of Chinese and New Zealand students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 353-368.

    [8]     Hueryeren Y, Dachuan H. (2012). The Mediating Effect of Organizational Commitment on Leadership Type and Job Perfomance. Journal of Human Resources and Adult Leaning, 8, 50-59.

    [9]     ICEK AJZEN. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 665-683.Joanne Lloyd,Sally Frost, Ignas Kuliesius Claire L. Jones. (2019). Locus of control and involvement in videogaming. SAGE Journals, 30.

    [10]  Judge, T. A. and Robbins, S. (2007). Organisational Behaviour (12 ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

    [11]  Kutanis, R. O., Mesci, M. and Ovdur, Z. (2011). The Effects of Locus of Control on Learning Performance: A Case of an Academic Organization. Journal of Economic and Social studies, 1(2), 114-136.

    [12]  Martin, R., Thomas, G., Charles, K., Epitropaki, O., & McNamara, R. (2005). The role of leader-member exchanges in mediating the relationship between locus of control and work reactions. Journal of Occupation and Organizational Psychology, 78(1), 141-147.

    [13]  Miller D, Lee J. (2001). The People Make the Process: Commitment to Employees,Decision-Making and Performance. Journal of Management, 27, 163-189.

    [14]  Negin M, Omid M, Ahmad BM. (2013). The Impact of Organizational Commitment on Employees job performance. A study of Meli Bank. International Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5, 164-171.

    [15]  Omari, S. O., K’Obonyo P. and Kidombo H. (2012). “Human Resource Practices, the Relationship between Locus of Control and Employee Outcomes”. DBA Africa Management Review, 3(1), 90-99.

    [16]  Qaisar MU, Rehman MS, Suffyan M. (MARCH 2012). Exploring Effects of Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance Implications for Human Resource Strategy.

    [17]  Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement”. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1).